Today's Headlines

Today’s News 2-8-2024

Democrat senator promotes Satanism in Arizona state Capitol

(Post Millennial – Katie Daviscourt) *Lead Story*

Kerry Now Facing Oversight Investigation, Lawsuit Over Secretive Office, Meetings With Climate Activists

(Red State – Nick Arama) *Must Read*

The Delusions of Davos and Dubai – Part Three: Alternatives to Wind & Solar Energy

(American Greatness – Edward Ring)

Less than a year after Biden announced his EV push, industry shows his targets may be unobtainable

(Just The News – Kevin Killough)

Democrats Say Biden’s Pause on LNG Is Like ‘Throwing a Match in a Bale of Hay’

(Hot Air – Salena Zito)

Alabama Cops ‘Violently’ Arrested Two Elderly Women For Taking Care of Feral Cats

(Reason – Emma Camp) *Must Read*

Daily Wire, Texas AG Ask Court To Block State Department’s Domestic ‘Misinformation’ Efforts

(Daily Wire – Luke Rosiak)

Mollie Hemingway Breaks Down Everything Wrong With U.S. Elections From Mail-In Ballots To Zuckbucks To Censorship

(The Federalist – Jordan Boyd)

Shocking New Details About Fani Willis’ Relationship With Her Special Prosecutor

(PJ Media – Chris Queen)

Federal Judge Puts Damper On Jack Smith’s Victory

(Daily Caller – Katelynn Richardson)

Legal Consequences Arrive for Media Racism Smear Campaigns

(FrontPage Mag – Daniel Greenfield)

With Evergrande’s liquidation, is China’s Potemkin economy nearing its end?

(American Thinker – Andrea Widburg)

Open Border Allows Chinese Special Operators to Infiltrate America

(Gateway Pundit – John Mills)

Mitch McConnell played bigger part in failed border plan than anyone knew: ‘He wrote the deal’

(Washington Examiner – Rachel Schilke)

Impeach Him Again

(Breitbart – Ann Coulter) *Must Read*

Elizabeth Warren Takes on Big Dorito, Big Oreo, and Big Toilet Paper to Deflect Blame From Biden’s Economy

(Legal Insurrection – Mike LaChance)

The Jury Is Out

(Power Line – John Hinderaker)

Democrat governor of Massachusetts nominates ex-girlfriend to state’s highest court: ‘No one more qualified’

(The Blaze – Cortney Weil)

Of course you interview Putin

(Substack – Don Surber)

New Lies for Old as the Workers Revolt

(News With Views – Cliff Kincaid) *Must Read*

Browse all 'News' »

Videos and Op Ed

Cyber Attack, Election Interference, Or Coincidence? Super Tuesday Facebook Meta Outage

Posted on March 5th, 2024 in 'Video'

(X / Twitter Did Not Fall)

The outage on Super Tuesday affected several Meta-owned platforms, including Facebook, Messenger, and Instagram, disrupting user access on a global scale. This unexpected disruption coincided with the critical Super Tuesday presidential primaries, leading to concerns about the timing and potential implications for election interference. Meta’s spokesperson acknowledged the issue and assured users that efforts were underway to resolve the outage promptly.

In addition to the widespread impact on users, the outage also had financial repercussions, with stock markets reflecting the outage’s influence. Companies like Facebook, Coinbase, and Instagram experienced a decline in their stock prices due to the service disruptions. The outage highlighted the interconnectedness of digital platforms with financial markets, underscoring the significance of stable online services for both users and investors.

Reports of the outage were not limited to a specific region but were widespread across Europe, Asia, and the US, impacting a significant number of users in different parts of the world. Users encountered login problems and were unable to access their accounts on Facebook and Instagram during the outage, leading to frustration and concerns about the reliability of these popular social media platforms.

Meta’s communications director, Andy Stone, acknowledged the issues and reassured users that the company was actively working to address and resolve the disruptions to restore normal service as soon as possible, [4].

Reasons for Outage

Meta’s top social apps, such as Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, suffered a widespread outage that resulted in error messages and login difficulties for users. The outage, which coincided with the critical Super Tuesday presidential primaries, sparked concerns about its timing and potential implications for election interference. Users worldwide were left unable to access their accounts, leading to frustration and speculation about the underlying causes of the disruption.

The outage on Super Tuesday not only affected user access to Facebook and Instagram but also disrupted essential services like the Meta Admin Center, Facebook login, WhatsApp Business API, and Marketing API. This extensive disruption across multiple platforms within the Meta ecosystem highlighted the complex interdependencies of these services, underscoring the challenges faced by the tech giant in resolving the outage promptly.

For instance, many businesses relying on WhatsApp for customer communication found themselves at a standstill, unable to interact with their clients during the outage, impacting their operations and customer service. Political Facebook ads and pages were unattainable during the outage, as well as business pages, etc.

Regional And Financial Impact of the Outage

The outage on Super Tuesday had far-reaching effects, with reports of disruptions pouring in from various regions, including Europe, Asia, and the US. Users encountered difficulties logging into their accounts and accessing Facebook and Instagram, impacting their ability to connect with friends, family, and communities. Users reported being logged out of their accounts and facing challenges in regaining access during the outage, leading to frustration and concerns about the reliability of these platforms during critical times.

The outage didn’t just affect users but also reverberated in the financial realm, with the stock market witnessing declines for tech giants like Facebook, Instagram, and Coinbase. The outage’s timing during the Super Tuesday presidential primaries heightened the significance of the situation, prompting questions about the potential economic repercussions and long-term implications for Meta’s market performance.

Despite the challenges, Meta’s communications director, Andy Stone, provided updates on the ongoing efforts to rectify the issues and restore normalcy to the affected platforms, emphasizing the company’s commitment to addressing user concerns and ensuring platform stability.

User Reactions and Social Media Trends

During the outage of Meta-owned platforms on Super Tuesday, frustrated users took to alternative social media platforms like Twitter X to express their concerns and experiences. The hashtag #facebookdown trended globally as users shared their struggles with being unexpectedly logged out of their accounts.

The outage prompted a wave of reactions from various users, including Elon Musk. Musk humorously acknowledged the situation with a meme, indicating the widespread impact of the outage on a diverse range of users and industries. Many Twitter/X users pointed out that while all other sites went down, this one stayed up. Many users found this suspicious.

Concerns About Election Interference and Voter Outreach

The outage on Super Tuesday not only impacted user access to Facebook, Instagram, and other Meta apps but also raised significant concerns about potential disruptions to voter outreach efforts during the critical primary elections. With the outage affecting social media platforms crucial for political campaigns’ communication strategies, questions arose regarding the impact on voter engagement and information dissemination. Campaigns heavily rely on these platforms to connect with voters, share their messages, and mobilize supporters, making any downtime a significant hurdle to these efforts.

The outage shed light on the vulnerability of social media platforms to external interference during crucial moments like elections. The timing of the outage occurring on an important election-related day heightened suspicions about potential deliberate disruptions aimed at influencing voter behaviors or election outcomes.

Overall, this outage emphasizes the need for better contingency plans and heightened cybersecurity measures to safeguard the integrity of democratic processes against unforeseen disruptions. The outage not only disrupted user experiences but also sparked discussions about the broader implications of relying heavily on digital platforms for political communication and engagement.

Meta’s Response and Ongoing Efforts

In response to the widespread outage affecting Meta-owned platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, Meta’s spokesperson, Andy Stone, assured users that the company was actively working on addressing the technical issues. Despite the reassurances, the lack of a clear timeline for resolving the outages left users and stakeholders in a state of uncertainty, highlighting the importance of prompt and transparent communication during such incidents. The ongoing efforts to restore full functionality to the affected services were crucial to maintaining user trust and engagement with Meta’s platforms.

The outage history of Meta, including previous significant disruptions, added to the concerns surrounding the Super Tuesday outage. Users and industry experts scrutinized Meta’s response to the outage, emphasizing the need for a more resilient infrastructure to prevent such widespread issues in the future. The impact of the outage on Meta’s reputation and its implications for user experience and platform reliability were key topics of discussion as the company worked towards resolving the technical challenges and restoring normal service.

Was it a cyber attack, election interference, or coincidence? You decide.

Browse all 'Video' »

Supreme Court Determines States Cannot Remove Trump From Ballots

Posted by Angie Kaye in 'Op Ed' on March 4th, 2024

The Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that the states cannot remove Trump from their ballots over J6 accusations, impacting his eligibility for the 2024 presidential election. This decision sets a precedence that will be felt throughout future elections.

rectangular red Supreme container

Trump’s Ballot Battle: Inside the Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision

The Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump cannot be removed from the 2024 presidential ballots by states, stating that only Congress has the authority to disqualify a candidate under the Constitution’s “insurrection clause”. This decision has significant implications for Trump’s eligibility for the upcoming election and sets a precedent for future challenges to candidates’ qualifications. The unanimous nature of the ruling underscores the clarity and strength of the Court’s position on this matter.

The key legal principles that influenced the Supreme Court’s decision revolved around the interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Section 3, which prohibits insurrectionists from holding office. By emphasizing that only Congress can enact disqualification under this clause, the Court reaffirmed the federal government’s authority in such matters. This ruling not only impacts Trump’s candidacy but also shapes the landscape of state-level challenges to candidates in federal elections.

This decision could basically punt the issue back to Congress, since the Supreme Court did not give a decision on whether or not Trump was guilty of insurrection. This is a key point for many who worry over the dangerous precedent that would be set by removing a presidential candidate from a ballot based on accusations for which they have not been convicted.

Background and Context Of The Supreme Court Decision

The events leading to the Supreme Court ruling were rooted in Trump’s alleged involvement in the January 6 insurrection, where he was accused of inciting violence at the Capitol. The insurrection clause in the Constitution, particularly Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, played a central role in the case, as it prohibits individuals who engaged in insurrection from holding office. 

Various states, including Colorado, brought forth challenges to Trump’s candidacy based on this provision, leading to conflicting rulings at the state and federal levels. However, no court has ever convicted Trump of those accusations, and allowing states to remove a candidate in these circumstances could lead to future candidates from both parties being removed over political mudslinging. 

While the Colorado Supreme Court initially ruled to bar Trump from the state’s primary ballot, the US Supreme Court overturned this decision, emphasizing the exclusive authority of Congress in matters of disqualification under the insurrection clause. The legal arguments presented during the case highlighted the complexities of balancing state and federal powers in regulating presidential elections, especially concerning allegations of insurrection.

Supreme Court’s Legal Analysis: It’s Up To Congress

In its legal analysis, the Supreme Court delved into the interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Section 3 and its application to presidential candidacy disqualification. The Court’s reasoning centered on the separation of powers, clarifying that state courts do not have the jurisdiction to enforce federal disqualification provisions. By aligning its decision with past electoral rulings, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the precedence of federal law in matters of national significance, such as presidential elections.

The ruling’s long-term effects on the electoral process are considerable, as it establishes a clear boundary between state and federal authority in regulating candidacy qualifications. By emphasizing that only Congress can disqualify a presidential candidate under the insurrection clause, the Court’s decision sets a precedent for future cases and reinforces the constitutional framework governing federal elections.

Ramifications on State-Level Challenges

The Supreme Court’s ruling has far-reaching implications for ongoing and future state-level challenges to candidates’ eligibility, particularly in cases involving insurrection allegations. The decision not only impacts Trump’s candidacy but also guides how states approach disqualification issues for federal offices.

States involved in challenging Trump’s qualification, such as Colorado, are now bound by the Supreme Court’s ruling, which clarifies that states cannot unilaterally disqualify candidates based on federal provisions like the insurrection clause. The precedents set by this decision will likely influence state-level election laws and regulations, ensuring a more consistent application of federal standards in candidate vetting processes.

Constitutional Implications and Legal Precedents

The case surrounding Trump’s ballot eligibility raised important constitutional considerations, particularly concerning the scope of the 14th Amendment’s insurrection provision and its applicability to presidential candidates. The arguments presented in the case underscored the complexities of interpreting this constitutional clause in the context of modern political challenges.

By rejecting the use of the 14th Amendment to keep Trump off the ballot, the Supreme Court clarified the boundaries of state authority in regulating federal elections. This decision not only resolves immediate disputes but also sets a legal precedent for future interpretations of the Constitution, especially regarding insurrection allegations and their impact on presidential candidacies.

Key Takeaways and Future Outlook

In summary, the Supreme Court’s ruling regarding Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 election ballots reaffirms the federal government’s exclusive authority in matters of candidate disqualification under the insurrection clause. This decision carries significant implications for the upcoming election landscape and underscores the importance of a consistent legal framework for regulating federal elections.

The case serves as a defining moment in clarifying the boundaries of states’ authority in regulating federal elections, ensuring that challenges to candidates’ qualifications adhere to established constitutional principles. Moving forward, the ruling is likely to shape future legal developments and challenges in the electoral process, setting a clear precedent for how insurrection allegations are addressed at the federal level.

Browse all 'Op Ed' »

Advertise here on
RebellionNews.com
*_Contact us now for more info_*